Apr
6
Spaz, The Great American Woman asked:
How can The Powers That Be compare the two? A broad category shouldn’t be compared with a single entity. There are numerous types of cancer, but ‘heart disease’ is specific. Isn’t that like saying “fruit has replaced corn as children’s favorite food”?
Again, I say “A broad category shouldn’t be compared with a single entity”… Please answer the whole question, not just the initial one.
How can The Powers That Be compare the two? A broad category shouldn’t be compared with a single entity. There are numerous types of cancer, but ‘heart disease’ is specific. Isn’t that like saying “fruit has replaced corn as children’s favorite food”?
Again, I say “A broad category shouldn’t be compared with a single entity”… Please answer the whole question, not just the initial one.
Thank you.
Scott
Comments
No Responses to “Why has cancer replaced heart disease as the leading cause of death?”
The leading cause of death.
Quite simply put, because more people will be dying from Cancer, than from heart disease.
The heart is an unfair study and definitely onesided.
My opinion they are noncomparable it is an unfair study and definitely onesided.
The statistic is important in that the powers that as americans we.
From what I heard, this was partially based on the fact that 40% of all cigarette smokers are in China and India which will increase the amount of lung cancer worldwide based on the numbers who smoke.